Mail Online needs to get their facts straight

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2300604/David-Phelps-son-Westboro-Baptist-Church-leader-attacked-naked-35-STONE-man.html

quote:
"An eye-witness later claimed that he saw Phelps being pursued down the street outside the mobile studio by a naked fat man."

An eye witness? That was Chrometuna.  They wrote that like he was just some stranger or passerby who happened to witness that. Chrometuna hs been a member of the battlecam community for about three years, minus his year long ban.  He has accepted prize money and was a member of the rv team.

Where is the video?
 quote:
"Rob Cutler, from Topeka, Kansas, where the church is based, said: 'I was amazed, first I see David run out of a motor home and the next thing I know he's been sat on by this giant naked man who is screaming "who's your daddy now Davey?"'"

It was rumored, in chat that  Chrometuna allegedly "grabbed" body parts of David Phelps and he was shoved out of the rv quickly so they would not all be charged.  They fled the scene and sped off to their next fail event.

So, which was it? Did Chrometuna grab David Phelps body or did BTF sit on him? Which was it? or both?